Vertical App View Counts Explained: Why Metrics Without Transparency Don’t Tell the Full Story
posted on
Deng Xiang on Unsplash
🧠 FanTalk: The Numbers Illusion
View Counts, Metrics, and Why Transparency Matters in VertiLand
View counts are everywhere in VertiLand. They’re proudly displayed on vertical apps, used in marketing campaigns, and often presented as proof of success. But here’s the real question: what do those numbers actually mean?
As a viewer, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to want clarity. If platforms expect us to trust their metrics — and to financially support their content — we deserve to understand what we’re being shown.
📊 What Is a “View,” Exactly?
That’s the first and most important question — and one that remains unanswered.
A “view” could mean:
-
One account watching an entire series from start to finish
-
One full episode watched
-
One minute watched
-
Or simply hitting “play”
Each definition carries a very different weight. Yet platforms rarely — if ever — clarify which one they use.
What happens if I stop after one episode? Or five? Or if I skip repetitive or abusive scenes? Does that still count? If so, can we really consider that a meaningful view?
For viewers who actively avoid giving engagement to harmful or abusive content, this lack of clarity feels unfair. If merely testing a series inflates its success metrics, then viewers are unknowingly supporting content they may actually reject.
Benjamin Lehman on Unsplash
🔍 How Are Views Counted?
This is where transparency becomes critical.
I’ve checked the Terms of Use for multiple vertical apps. None clearly explain how view counts are calculated. No methodology. No third-party verification. No audit.
When platforms are the sole authority over their own metrics, it raises legitimate concerns. Without independent oversight, view counts become a marketing tool — not an objective measure.
And yes, marketing works. Inflated numbers create social proof. If people see “10 million views in 24 hours,” they’re more likely to click — even if the content doesn’t resonate with them. The system feeds itself.
🤨 Do I Trust These Numbers?
Short answer: no.
Especially when independent verticals — widely praised and heavily shared by the community — show modest view counts, while platform-produced titles explode overnight with numbers that don’t align with visible audience response.
Platforms often claim they “produce what viewers want based on data.” But that data is never shared.
Interestingly, when fan-led surveys are shared — like the one conducted by Jen from Vertical Drama Love — the results frequently contradict platform narratives.
Vertical Evolution by i.love.verticals
🔄 Back to the Basics: What Changed?
Let’s talk trends.
In 2023 and early 2024, VertiLand had chaos — but fun chaos. Drama queens were outrageous, not dangerous. Think Cassie in The Double Life of My Billionaire Husband: messy, mean, but not violent.
Fast forward to late 2024 and 2025, and the landscape shifted.
More slaps. More humiliation banquets. More abuse — including toward children, pregnant women, disabled characters, and pets.
This isn’t “drama.” This is trauma — and platforms justify it using data we can’t verify.
🌱 Where Do We Go From Here?
VertiLand is growing. The market is booming. Which makes this the moment to choose direction.
If the future is recycled abuse for shock value, then many of us aren’t the target audience anymore. And that’s heartbreaking — because we came for fun, romance, escapism, and unhinged joy.
I still believe there’s hope. Indie creators are pushing boundaries in the right way. New platforms like CheraTV are emerging with fresh intentions.
But transparency matters. Originality matters. And viewers deserve respect.
For 2026, my wish is simple:
✨ Less violence.
✨ More creativity.
✨ Let’s bring back the cuties.